Congrats to Jared Inouye, Andy Dorais and Jason Dorias, who just last week completed what they dub, “The Hulk Hogum”, a link up of 8 steep couloirs and lines in Little Cottonwood Canyon, UT. Jared shares his take on the day in this trip report and claims success on his lightweight gear. For the most part, I agree with Jared on the lightweight thing for getting stuff done in the mountains, but I’m not so sure about race skis in the mountains and would maybe bump up to a 65mm waisted ski, compared to Jared’s 78mm skis. Either way, a sweet ski-day in the Wasatch by these guys…nice one!
The Hulk Hogum = Pfeif NW Couloir, Cham Chute, Montgomery, Sliver,
Dresden Face, Hypodermic Needle, Coalpit Headwall and Y Couloir.
This week, brothers Andy and Jason Dorais and I completed a linkup of several prominent lines in Hogum Fork in the backcountry of Little Cottonwood Canyon, Utah. Andy calls it the “Hulk Hogum.” We began with the Northwest Couloir of the Pfeifferhorn; skied a soon-to-be named/identified coolie in upper Hogum, which we thought might be Snap Dragon, but on further reflection decided, not; knocked off some of the more popular steep lines of Lightning Ridge–Montgomery, the Sliver, Dresden Face, Hypodermic Needle; and finished with a descent of the Coalpit Headwall, a traverse to the top of the Y Couloir, and out the Y Couloir.
– Lines Skied: Pfeif NW, Cham Chute, Montgomery, Sliver, Dresden Face, Hypodermic Needle,Coalpit headwall, Y Couloir
– Total Vertical: 11,700 up, 14,475 down
– Time: 13 hrs, 41 minutes
– Redundant Uptracks: up Sliver 2x , up Needle apron/Coalpit ridge 3x
– Raps: 1 on Pfeiff NW, 2 on Montgomery
– Collective Gear: lightweight skinny skis, tech bindings, Whippets, minimalist harnesses, 60 meter 6mm cord, tat, a few nuts, a few pins, and 1 ice tool.
– Conditions: not spring, not what was forecasted, WINDY, variable snow–pow, windboard, ice
– Injuries: 1 scraped knee (Jason’s), several frost-nipped and now numb finger tips (mine and Jason’s)
– Mood: cynical, sardonic, stoked, exuberant, pissed-off (Coalpit Ridge x 3, skin failure x 5), amazed, frightened, inspired, grateful, beat down, and lifted up.
Andy Dorais, Jared Inouye, and Jason Dorais, hungry and tired.
In the last few years, I’ve been inspired by alpinism — climbing hard and long routes with minimal gear as fast as possible. Reading the adventures and feats of guys like Mark Twight, Steve House, and now Colin Haley, just to name a few, has left my mind spinning, and wondering. This is one reason that I’ve been interested in rando racing, which is all about skiing fast and minimally. While alpinism and ski mountaineering, ski alpinisme if you’re french, are not the same, I think there are parallels and even a fair amount of crossover. I also think that ski mountaineering has been and will continue to be informed and driven by rando racing, although the two disciplines also have differences.
Rando racing has had a major effect on my skiing. Nowadays, it’s hard for me to clip into my 95mm waisted Manaslus, which weigh 3.8 pounds per foot. It’s even hard to clip into my 78mm waisted Trab Free Randos, which weigh 3.1 pounds per foot. I often, even on a powder day, find myself clipping into my 65 mm race skis, which weigh 2.1 pounds per foot. Why? Because going light = going higher and longer with less effort. Because going light allows me to ski routes like the Hulk Hogum. Because going light presents the possibility of one day going big.
Andy climbing the Pfeif in the wind.
The Hulk Hogum
If I were to choose one word to characterize the Hulk Hogum, it would be “steep.” All of the lines in the Hulk Hogum, at their best, are between 45 and 55 degrees. We were lucky to get a couple of the lines in soft conditions (Cham Chute, Dresden and Coalpit). Some of the others presented a clinic on skiing icy to breakable conditions on lightweight ski gear. Although I know there were times when I didn’t look (or feel) all that calm and fluid, I don’t think I ever took a fall, and in my book, that’s a success.
Being in Hogum Fork is always special. Nearly every side of Hogum is rimmed with spires. In the Wasatch, it may be as good as it gets.
To accomplish this project, we needed some climbing gear, which would increase what we normally carry. In trying to go lighter, I brought a 60 meter 6mm cord, used a 95 gram harness, and left my belay device in the car. I was really happy with the 6mm cord, which at 22 grams per meter weighs less than half of one strand of a twin or half rope. I carried the cord for the first part our tour, and after I began complaining about it, Jason stuffed it in his pack. The 6mm cord on a Munter hitch also worked nicely, even on an overhanging rap.
A couple of the lines in the Hulk Hogum required a rope. Getting into Montgomery from the Sliver required a rope, and then we had to rap the cliffs at the mid sections of the Pfeif NW Couloir and Montgomery. The Dorais brothers built the anchors on Montgomery, leaving $30 worth of offerings to the mountain for which they will be blessed, no doubt.
Where is Snap Dragon?
If it’s not yet obvious, one of the recurring themes of the day was the Snap Dragon. Where is it? I think my partners were a bit annoyed with my Snap Dragon fixation. Surely, the Cham Chute was a decent substitute, but I would like to find and, one day, ski Snap Dragon. Help, anyone?
Hey Rando, 78mm would have been nice. Jared was on 65mm, Jason on 70mm and mine were the fatties at 75mm underfoot. Less is more! Bringing skinny back to the Wasatch!
copy that andy…nice mission!
Yeah, going light is definitely right, but 65mm skis may be a bit much (not taking a fall, being a success).
It’s addictive I know (very seldom convince myself to ski my Zzeros these days.. over TLT5’s). But in my opinion it’s more fun to lay stylish/ strong turns along the way too.
Great inspiration though!
totally agree about the tlt5’s. using them is like night and day compared to other boots…rarely reach for my quadrants anymore…at least for this time of year.
whoa… nice one jared and bros! i have to agree with light is right but not for my skis. i wanna enjoy the turns. if it’s not a race i’m not wearing race skis. give me some drifters… 125 underfoot!
steve – which tlt5 do you use?
matt…the performance, with intuition alpine liner. this model liner still allows for great mobility in walk mode…and some extra beef in ski mode.
Impressive work. Solid day.
Steve – when are we going to see a review of the TLTs from you?
mtn surf, fat skis have their place, but I really don’t think a tour like that would be possible on drifters. At least during daylight hours. Fun and stylish turns are had when you’re not chasing a steep 12k vert day over technical terrain. 🙂
I’ve done most of my skiing this year on Trab World Cup race skis. Although I have trained quite a bit on them in past seasons, I still skied the BC on “regular” set ups. This year was different and I committed to skiing everything on race gear. What a difference it makes. There is a significant learning curve that is not obvious with occasional use. Hard to go back now. It’s very addictive moving that fast and generally have a good time going down. Way more face shots than those water skis. But as long as you are having fun…
Anyway, proud effort by the SLC boys. More to come.
justin…soon, i hope!
Steve, what size/shape ski do you prefer for technical terrain? What are you thoughts on the BD Stigma?
Omr – the Stigma / TLTs has been my one and only set-up for the past three seasons. I rock them with F3s. In my opinion they’re too heavy and sport too much side-cut – great turny ski with lots of float, but someday when I can afford another set-up I’m going with something way lighter from Ski Trab or Dynafit (Broad Peaks look sick!)
Omr…i’ve beed using the bd aspects for when it’s steep and firm. It’s mosy just a spring setup, since i like to go a bit fatter when the snow is soft. The aspects are 90mm at the waist and 19m(ish) sidecut…i think they are lighter than the stigma too?